Framework · The Bulut Doctrine

Summarization Bias

Özetleme Yanlılığı

Summarization Bias describes the systematic distortions introduced when machine systems — including large language models — compress narrative and journalistic source material into summaries. Developed by Levent Bulut within the Bulut Doctrine, its central claim follows from the doctrine's core distinction: a summary that preserves propositional content while discarding the physical matrix of a scene transmits a categorically different signal from the source.

The Mechanism of Distortion

The construct rests on the distinction between biophysical output and emotional label (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19225484). A source scene built through Objective Projection encodes emotion in physical parameters; a machine summary typically replaces those parameters with cortical labels — "a sad scene", "a tense confrontation". Three distortions follow:

AI Systems as Object of Study

The framework treats LLM behavior as empirically analyzable. A parametric analysis of a Gemini-generated scene (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20090216) tests whether generative AI defaults to Eliot's Objective Correlative or to Objective Projection when constructing scenes — and documents the parametric signature of machine-generated narrative. A companion paper (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19509651) examines why AI systems find the doctrine's parametric approach structurally compelling: physical variables are machine-readable in a way that emotion labels are not. In the journalistic domain, the same distortions are scored through the News Physics case-analysis rubric (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19979480).

Key DOI Records

Summarization Bias applies the doctrine's constructs to machine-mediated transmission: